Which Mac Mini Is Best For Video Editing

Keep in mind that each new Mac mini seems to be less user-serviceable than the previous version so it's best to get the higher spec'd model at the time of purchase. Also know that the Mac mini is made from laptop parts, this is why the entire machine has such a small footprint. Hi Reddit, given the new Mac Mini coming up, what's the best configuration you would recommend for video editing on 4K (amateur YouTuber.

So I'm only a 16 year old guy, and some of you might not consider my arguments valid simply because I don't have much experience. I'm a film making geek, I make short films whenever I'm bored. I've always been a PC guy, and last year, I had a film making class in high school for one semester (5 months) and the class was full of Macs. I used the Mac, I liked some of the features that the Mac had, however, there were many times that frustrated me during using the machine. I've always thought that Macs always looked better than PC's, but as I've read more about computers, I've come to realize that it's only a matter of personal perefrence and screen resolution. You want a glorious monitor on your PC? Buy a 1440p monitor for less than $600.

Cost: I don't think I need to mention this, but i'll do it anyway. How can i make outlook 2016 for mac use the same mail file as outlook in my 2010 vm under fusion You can get a PC that's as powerful as a private jet for half the price as a Mac. Here's a computer build that I'm saving up for, mostly for my 3D animations and Visual Effects: I didn't include a monitor in the list, because I already have one.

So, in total with a regular 1080p 24in monitor, the price will reach $2000. Now, wouldn't a Mac that has these specs cost AT LEAST $3000? Social Status: Everyone kept saying that they wish they had a Mac, simply because it looks colourful and futureistic.

After using the Mac at school the first day, I went back home, used my PC again and thought 'I don't see what all the fuss is about.' Conclusion: Explain to me why you Mac people prefer it so much over PC (other than the fact that you're just simply used to it) and tell me why you'd rather spend at least $1000 more on a desktop Mac that will give you the same performance as a PC that costs $1000 less. I'm not trying to create an argument, but I just need to know. Conclusion: Explain to me why you Mac people prefer it so much over PC. Implying that people here prefer Mac's, they are pretty much universally flamed here.

We found it using little background processing and is bereft of adverts and spam. Choose app for magnet link mac.

The only Apple discussions happening at Toms is iOS stuff and a Mac vs PC flamewar thread thats resurrected every 3 months or so. Decent amount of Hackintosh stuff though. People have differing opinions of what looks good, but if you don't like their sleek white towers then your a bit stuffed. Though I will say that Apple products are damn good examples of Industrial Design. In terms of screens, pretty much what you said, 'Retina' is just a fancy way of saying they have a high resolution IPS panel in their machines. Stock Mac's at launch typically aren't too bad in terms of hardware price, especially considering the software and OS included.

However once time goes by and you want more than stock configuration is where they start price gouging. Cant deny that Apple does have a prestige around it, but I think the whole 'Unique' and 'Think Different' brand they have built around themselves is crumbling. When they started they were rebelling against 'The Man' (IBM, look at their 1984 ad) but now they are The Man. My opinion on why people get Mac's is simply because its simpler than a PC, they are willing to pay extra for that ease of use and the closed-garden ecosystem that Apple have.

Meanwhile us here on the forum are willing to slog through the issues of an open platform for the superior performance and flexibility. Quite simply different audiences.

Which company is best for video games

Not sure if anyone can answer that question right now, but I would think it's a little light for video work, especially if more demanding software is used. I have been using a 2009 iMac for light video work in iMovie, but any longer projects are moved to a recent 15' MBP, and I don't have any 4K files yet, which we know is in our future, even if you don't need 4K quality, the downsized 1080 files are better than native 1080 files, according to reviews. As for RAM, I went from 4gigs on my iMac to 16 on the MBP (which also has discrete graphics) so I can't give any comparison of 8 to 16 differences, and I haven't checked the Apple site yet to check out pricing or the RAM non-upgradable issue mentioned by others.

I would like to pick up a Mini to run two monitors for non or light video editing, though. It probably would be okay for photos, but others can answer that question; I only do a few things in LightRoom.